ANTHEM

Selected bibliography of works dealing with both actor-network theory and Heidegger (or phenomenology)

2008

• Harman, G., Latour, B. et al. (2008). “The Harman Review: Bruno Latour’s Empirical Metaphysics” [Audio]. An ANTHEM Group Symposium. Information Systems and Innovation Group, London School of Economics and Political Science, 5 February 2008
• McGrail, R. (2008) “Working with Substance: Actor-Network Theory and the Modal Weight of the Material.” Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology. 12(1).
• Riis, S. (2008). “The Symmetry between Bruno Latour and Martin Heidegger: The Technique of Turning a Police Officer into a Speed Bump.” Social Studies of Science 38(2): 285-301.

2007

• Harman, G. (2007). “On Actors, Networks, and Plasma: Heidegger vs. Latour vs. Heidegger” [PDF, audio]. Seminar. Information Systems Research Forum, Information Systems and Innovation Group, London School of Economics and Political Science, 29 November 2007
• Harman, G. (2007). Prince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics. Unpublished manuscript.
• Harman, G. (2007). “The Importance of Bruno Latour for Philosophy.” Cultural Studies Review: Recalling Modernity 13(1).
• Introna, L. (2007). “Maintaining the Reversibility of Foldings: Making the Ethics (Politics) of Information Technology Visible.” Ethics and Information Technology 9(1): 11-25.
• Oppenheim, R. (2007). “Actor-Network Theory and Anthropology after Science, Technology, and Society.” Anthropological Theory 7(4): 471-93.

2006

• Valfells, Á. (2006). “Comparing Two Information Systems Philosophical Methods: Phenomenology and Actor-Network Theory” [PDF]. Institute of Business Research Working Paper Series. University of Iceland.

2005

• Introna, L. (2006). “Phenomenology, Technology and Ethics: Thinking about the Morality of our Machines” [Video]. research seminar, Department of Information Systems, London School of Economics and Political Science, 1 December 2005.
• Verbeek, P.-P. (2005). What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. University Park, Pa., Pennsylvania State University Press.

2004

• Klaus, H. (2004). Elements of a Hermeneutics of Knowledge in Government: The Coalition of Public Sector Reform and Enterprise Resource Planning [PDF]. Faculty of Information Technology. Brisbane, Queensland University of Technology. PhD Thesis.

2003

• Ihde, D. (2003). “If Phenomenology Is an Albatross, Is Post-phenomenology Possible?” Chasing Technoscience: Matrix for Materiality. D. Ihde and E. Selinger. Bloomington & Indianapolis, Indiana University Press 131-44.
• Khong, L. (2003). “Actants and Enframing: Heidegger and Latour on Technology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 34A(4): 693-704.

2002

• Ciborra, C. (2002). The Labyrinths of Information: Challenging the Wisdom of Systems. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
• Ihde, D. (2002). “You Can’t Have It Both Ways: Situated or Symmetrical.” Bodies in Technology. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press: 67-87.
• Ihde, D. (2002). “Failure of the Nonhumans: A Science Studies Tale.” Bodies in Technology. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press: 88-100.

1999

• Feenberg, A. (1999). Questioning Technology. London, Routledge
• Whitley, E. A. (1999). “Understanding Participation in Entrepreneurial Organizations: Some Hermeneutic Readings.” Journal of Information Technology 14: 193-202.

1998

• Ciborra, C. U. and O. Hanseth (1998). “From Tool to Gestell: Agendas for Managing the Information Infrastructure.” Information Technology & People 11(4): 305-27.